A framework for implementing best laboratory practices for non-integrated point of care tests in low resource settings.

The method we respond to pandemics is still inadequate for dealing with the point of care testing (POCT) requirements of the next large epidemic. The proposed framework highlights the importance of having defined policies and procedures in place for non-integrated POCT to protect patient safety. In the absence of a pathology laboratory, this paradigm may help in the supply of diagnostic services to low-resource centers. A review of the literature was used to construct this POCT framework for non-integrated and/or unconnected devices. It also sought professional advice from the Chemical Pathology faculty, quality assurance laboratory experts and international POCT experts from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). Our concept presents a comprehensive integrated and networked approach to POCT with direct and indirect clinical laboratory supervision, particularly for outpatient and inpatient care in low-resource health care settings.

Assessing Third-Year Medical Students' Perspective on Point of Care Testing Boot Camp: From Bench to Bedside.

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT), which is also known as bed side-testing, has been integrated into the healthcare system, offering faster results that can lead to improved patient outcomes. POCT was missing from the medical education curriculum in our institute. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to describe the development and introduce POCT training for medical students in a medical college in Pakistan.Secondary objectives were to evaluate student performance on POCT content and to assess the impact of POCT training via students' feedback. Methodology: The boot camp experience was devised, directed, and facilitated by team constituting of Chemical Pathology faculty members, laboratory technologists and teaching assistants. The program included presentations, demonstrations of POCT instrument handling, supervised hands-on individual performance on glucometer using quality control specimens, competency assessment and sign off followed by interactive case-based discussions. A knowledge quiz via Kahoot was administered at the beginning and end of the experience and scores were compared statistically. Online evaluation and feedback were designed via virtual learning environment based on 10 questions regarding the program and methodology using on a five-point Likert Scale. Frequencies were generated and t-tests were employed to determine pre-post differences. Results: The boot camp was spread over 2 days and ran three hours each day with the third-year medical students class split into two groups (n=80). On knowledge evaluation, the mean group pre and post test scores were 45% and 95% respectively (p-value =< 0.05). On documented structured competency assessment form a score of 95 was achieved by 100% participants. Positive feedback of 4 or more was recorded on the Likert's scale by 100% respondents. Conclusion: This POCT boot camp experience can be used by other institutions and can be applied at different times during the medical school curriculum and other professional education programs. This bootcamp will be helpful to educate medical students, postgraduate trainees and field workers working in rural areas and in low resource settings to deliver reliable POC tests results. Future research should examine these students' competence in achieving POCT skills when they enter in clinical practice.

Significance of diabetes on morbidity and mortality following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with diabetes suffering from peritoneal surface disease represent a challenge to treat due to the effects of both processes on multiple organ systems. We sought to define the impact of diabetes on outcomes following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 1065 CRS/HIPEC procedures was conducted. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics were reviewed. RESULTS: CRS/HIPEC was performed in 91 diabetic and 844 non-diabetic patients with peritoneal surface disease from 1991 to 2013. Diabetics and non-diabetics spent 6.8 and 3.1 (P = 0.009) days in the ICU, respectively. Diabetics were more likely to suffer major complications (P < 0.001) including infectious (P < 0.001) and thrombotic (P = 0.05) complications, arrhythmias (P = 0.007), renal insufficiency (P = 0.002) and respiratory failure (P = 0.002) than non-diabetics. Mortality was significantly worse for diabetic patients at 30-days (8.8% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.007) and at 90-days (13.2% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.008). Even after adjusting for other significant predictors of morbidity, diabetes predicted more major complications and increased mortality following CRS/HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes predicts major complications and specific complication patterns associated with increased ICU stay and worse mortality in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Diabetic patients deemed to be appropriate candidates for CRS/HIPEC should be treated with caution.

Outcomes with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis.

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) has traditionally been approached with therapeutic nihilism. The evolution of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) over the last two decades, however, has caused a paradigm shift in treatment for PM. This modality is rapidly gaining acceptance as standard of care for PM from various cancers. This article reviews the current literature regarding the use of CRS/HIPEC for PM from the most common intra-abdominal malignancies.

Significance of diaphragmatic resections and thoracic chemoperfusion on outcomes of peritoneal surface disease treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic resection (DR) during CRS/HIPEC exposes the thoracic cavity to direct contamination from the peritoneal cavity. The effect of thoracic chemoperfusion in combination with HIPEC in these patients is unknown. METHODS: A prospective database of 1,077 procedures was analyzed. Type of malignancy, thoracic perfusion, resection status, comorbidities, morbidity, mortality, and overall survival were reviewed. RESULTS: DR was a component of 102 CRS/HIPEC procedures performed for 57 (55.9 %) appendiceal and 22 (21.6 %) colon primary lesions. DR was associated with higher volume of disease as evidenced by more organ resections (3.7 vs. 2.8, p < 0.001) and increased rates of incomplete cytoreduction (67 vs. 52 %, p = 0.004). Patients with and without DR had similar 30-day major morbidity (23.5 vs. 16.8 %, p = 0.1) and worse 90-day mortality (12.8 % vs. 6.12 %, p = 0.03), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed DR (p = 0.01) and diabetes (p = 0.005) to be associated with worse mortality. Nineteen (20 %) DR patients underwent synchronous abdominal and thoracic chemoperfusion. Intrathoracic recurrence following DR with thoracic perfusion was 17 % (3/18) vs. 2.3 % (2/85) without perfusion (p = 0.04). Median survival following complete cytoreduction was similar for patients with low-grade appendiceal (LGA) (not reached with DR and 175 months without DR, p = 0.17) and colorectal cancer (23 months with and 31 months without DR, p = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic resection during CRS/HIPEC is an independent predictor of surgical mortality. Intrapleural perfusion was associated with more thoracic recurrence; however, complete cytoreduction with or without DR can achieve similar survival for patients with LGA and colorectal primary lesions. DR should be performed only if careful inspection deems all peritoneal disease resectable.

Clinical outcomes for neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and ampulla of Vater: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Previous case series report that neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the ampulla of Vater have worse overall survival (OS) than NETs in the duodenum. We aimed to compare the OS of patients with ampullary NETs to patients with duodenal NETs. METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 1988 to 2009. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Ampullary NETs (n = 120) were larger (median size 18 vs. 10 mm, p < 0.001), higher grade (poorly and undifferentiated tumor 42 % vs. 12 %, p < 0.001), higher SEER historic stage (distant metastasis 16 % vs. 7 %, p < 0.001), and more often resected (78 % vs. 60 %, p < 0.001) than duodenal NETs (n = 1,360). Median OS was significantly worse for patients with ampullary NETs than with duodenal NETs (98 vs. 143 months, p = 0.037). Local resection was performed for 50.5 % of the resected ampullary NETs and resulted in similar OS compared to locally resected duodenal NETs (HR 1.37, 95 % CI 0.76-2.48, p = 0.291). CONCLUSIONS: While ampullary NETs are more advanced at presentation and have worse OS than duodenal NETs, long-term survival is possible with proximal small bowel NETs. For locally resected NETs, OS is similar between ampullary and duodenal NETs.

Current surgical management of pancreatic cancer.

En bloc resection is the treatment of choice for localized pancreatic cancer. While the perioperative mortality associated with resection is low, it still carries a significant morbidity rate of up to 50% in certain high-risk subsets of patients. With advances in perioperative care, radical resection with inclusion of adjacent vascular structure to achieve negative margin status can be performed with comparable mortality and morbidity in high-volume centers. Early results with the use of minimally invasive technique in pancreatic surgery are promising. Recent data on perioperative care to decrease morbidity with pancreatic surgery will also be discussed.